In another’s head

What is it like to look through another’s eyes?

Mark Strizic: Robin Boyd House, Walsh Street South Yarra, Courtyard 1958

Mark Strizic: Robin Boyd House, Walsh Street South Yarra, Courtyard 1958

There’s current interest in the photography of Mark Strizic (see past post) as a documenter of 1960s Melbourne. Fifty years ago he became a champion of the city’s heritage, a visual provocateur at the forefront of the resistance to the creeping uglification that threatened a city he had come to love as a post-war immigrant. He had close association with Melbourne’s most significant architects. His work ranged from traditional large format architectural shots, to a more humanist concentration, through the lens of a 35mm camera, on habitation in this city.

What are we to make of his work half-a-century later? How would you see if you were to look through his lens now? Here is a project that does just that…

John Gollings, from the video "John Golllings:Eye for Architecture"

John Gollings, from the video “John Golllings:Eye for Architecture”

ABC Radio National’s latest By Design episode of 17 April includes an interview with John Gollings, a leading photographer of the buildings of Australia’s most significant architects; from Glenn Murcutt to Harry Seidler. Fenella Kernebone introduces Gollings as taking up the baton of Mark Strizic who worked closely with the great Modernist Australian architect Robin Boyd. The occasion of this interview is the release of a new edition of Robin Boyd’s Living In Australia, which was first published in 1970 and which promotes Boyd’s philosophy with which Strizic sympathised and which influenced the trajectory of Australian architectural design.

The book features the original Mark Strizic photos as well as new images taken by John Gollings. This fact makes it of relevance to the theme of this blog in that the Living In Australia reissue puts Gollings, a contemporary photographer of postmodern architecture behind the lens of a European photographer of Modernism, but one who also looked longingly back at Melbourne’s historic European heritage.

The following includes quotes from my transcript of the program from the podcast.

Gollings remembers meeting Strizic through printer and fellow young photographer Tim Handfield in 1973. At Tim’s suggestion he employed Mark to make prints for a big exhibition of Gollings photographs of New Guinea.

JG: He was extraordinary – I took the contact sheets to him and he took over completely as the editor and art director, and printer, and was really instrumental in giving me incredible amount of encouragement to pursue personal projects of mine.

JG: …he trained as a physicist and he loved the chemistry and the physics and the optics of photography, but his father had been an architect, and Mark…I believe his first love would have been to be a painter…certainly saw himself as an artist who could use technology to evoke a whole new spirit in the world. He was one of those photographers who broke away from the stiff formality of fifties cameras and theoretical approaches into a much looser wild 35 mm grainy approach to…shooting architecture, and it was a revolution in its day.

Clifton Pugh: Portrait of Mark Strizic (1968), note the Nikon F with Photomic

Clifton Pugh: Portrait of Mark Strizic (1968), note the Nikon F with Photomic

Gollings details this transition in Strizic’s style during the production of the first monograph on Robin Boyd:

1965 Nikon with Photomic head

1965 Nikon with Photomic head

JG:…you can see the changes in style as you go through the pages of the book. Mark then felt liberated because he was working for nothing [he was so keen to see the monograph on his friend published], so he picked up a Nikon and shot it all in this very atmospheric style of in/out focus and underexposure and high contrast, and its a fascinating exercise to go through the book to look at these two radically different approaches to architectural photography.

Kernebone asks if Gollings thinks this is a successful approach in comparison to his own methods. Gollings’ reply is revealing…

JG: [chuckles] Um, its successful in trying to illustrate Boyd’s thesis, but I don’t think its a particularly good approach to…um…photographing architecture in general – photographers have a massive responsibility to drop their own ego, I believe, and take as objective a picture of the building as possible, and to show the whole building and not crop off the edges, and to show it in a fairly regular accessible, ah, bit of light that if you turned up a year later to actually look at the building you would recognise the building from the photograph, and I can’t say that that is what Mark did in every case here.

Mark Strizic (1928-2012): Photographer's shadow, July 1970

Mark Strizic (1928-2012): Photographer’s shadow, July 1970

ugliness-coversThat he says ‘successful in trying to illustrate Boyd’s thesis’ is significant given Strizic’s  sympathies with Boyd’s  controversial criticism of Australian  suburban culture in his book The Australian Ugliness of 1960. Likewise Strizic’s photography began to illustrate Australian’s disdain for their architectural heritage and their scant regard for the  visual  aesthetics of their  urban environment amidst the destruction of  magnificent Gold Rush era buildings and verandahs and their replacement by high-rise modernist office-blocks. His work was widely published in architectural books and journals but also illustrated social commentary during this period of a national identity crisis with frequent contributions of his photo-essays to Walkabout, and other magazines and journals. Also published in 1960 was Strizic’s  and David Saunders Melbourne: A Portrait, which proclaimed  ‘its central thought is that while men make cities, the cities also affect the men’.

Kay Street Housing, Carlton, 1981–83

John Gollings (photographer) Kay Street Housing, Carlton, 1983

In questions of ego and objectivity one must take into account Gollings‘ own extravagant early work for Edmond and Corrigan from the 1970s to early 1980s including Church of the Resurrection, Keysborough, 1976; Freedom Club childcare centre, Keysborough, 1977; Kay Street Housing, Carlton, 1983 in which he uses elaborate artificial flash lighting for in-camera montage effects (pre-Photoshop) as compared to his more soberly crafted work of recent years.

Kernebone then asks, if Strizic’s was such an ego approach to photography, why it worked for Boyd who commissioned him so often.

Mark Strizic: Zoology Building, 1963-68, Australian National University, with photographer’s shadow

Gollings replies that it was Mark who ‘put the humanity onto the Boyd buildings’ and softened their otherwise rectilinear modernism, and that this was the side of his work that Boyd wanted to promote. Gollings emphasises a symbiosis between the photographer and the architect in terms of ‘putting them on the map’…and these thoughts lead into discussion of the re-photography project for the book in which Gollings finds himself in Strizic’s shoes…in a situation which reveals the two photographers’ generationally different visions…

JG: …re-photography is…where you find the original vantage point of the photographer and photograph what has changed over a period of time. I’ve been doing a project of my own work from the 1970s in Surfers Paradise that way. In this case Tony Lee from the Boyd Foundation wanted to analyse what had changed since Mark took the photographs, so it was a chance for me to actually get into Mark’s head and stand, or find, the exact position and take a facsimile shot and thereby judge the effect of and..of history and time on the success of the project, and that is where the interest came, in trying to take that exact copy of Mark’s vantage point…
JG: …it [was] somewhat frustrating…because I kept thinking this is not where I would stand…
FK: ..really..?
JG: yes, [laughs] and if I was to stand there I’d put different lens on!
FK: [laughs]
JG: um, but its, ah…a very…good exercise for a photographer every now and then to look at a project through the aesthetic of someone else, and in this case… I had always understood Mark’s amazingly gentle humanity, and also sometimes, by dint of circumstance or trees or the size of a block of land, you don’t have too many options of where you can stand to take an architectural photograph, but in most cases I was forced to make those minute little adjustments that um…went against the grain…but nevertheless we do have a photograph to compare against the original.

Indeed we could all learn from such an exercise, whether the re-photography is reproduction or copy, or as homage. Where and when does repeat photography steal across the boundary of intertext and origination to become replica, pastiche, parody, mimicry, imitation, duplication, ‘cover’ or sample, appropriation, re-representation, remake, imitation, or indeed as counterfeit, fake, forgery, simulation or simulacrum?

The book:

Boyd, Robin; Mark Strizic (2013) Living In Australia  Fishermans Bend, Vic. : Thames and Hudson Australia, c2013 ISBN 9780500500385, [Originally published in 1970, Living in Australia provided Boyd with an opportunity to describe his own approach to design. This new edition is co-published with the Robin Boyd Foundation.]

About these ads

2 responses to “In another’s head

  1. Pingback: …and through father’s eye | James McArdle: Camera/Eye·

  2. Pingback: A secret is out! | James McArdle: Camera/Eye·

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s